Alfalfa Response to Potassium Rate and Timing of Application
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) US Department of Agriculture; National Agricultural Library
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet | 51.1 KB | 06/26/2026 12:05:PM |
|
|
application/json | 22.8 KB | 06/27/2026 07:35:AM |
|
|
text/html | 10.1 KB | 06/26/2026 12:05:PM |
Project Citation:
Project Description
Alfalfa (Cropland Consistency 4.10RR) was established in Springfield, TN in spring 2012 on a Staser loam soil (Fine-loamy, mixed, active, thermic Cumulic Hapludolls). Soil test values were determined with Mehlich-1 using ICAP. Soil test K was low throughout the study. Phosphorus (134 kg P2O5 ha-1) and Boron (1.12 kg B ha-1) were applied each spring at green-up. The experimental design was a Latin square split-plot design, with four fertilizer K rates (0, 67, 134, and 269 kg K2O ha-1) as the main plots and two timings (one application at green-up or split applications) as the split-plots. From 2012 to 2014, alfalfa was harvested in approximately 30-day intervals with a Carter Harvester (Carter Mfg. Co., Inc., Brookston, IN). Harvests took place in July, August, and September in 2012, May, June, July, and September in 2013, and May, June, July, August, and September in 2014. Soil measurements included pH, buffer pH, Mehlich-1 P, K, Ca, Mg, Zn, Mn, and B, and crop measurements included dry matter yield, tissue K content, and K removal. Alfalfa tissue analysis was determined by nitric acid digestion and Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) spectrometry analysis of the diluted digest. Tissue K content and K removal are not available for the September harvest in 2014.
Resources in this dataset:
Resource Title: Savoy, Grant, and Leib 2021 Data. File Name: Savoy, Leib, and Grant 2021 Data.xlsx
Resource Title: Savoy, Grant, and Leib 2021 Data.
File Name: Savoy, Leib, and Grant 2021 Data.xlsx
Scope of Project
Related Publications
Published Versions
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as received from the data depositor. ICPSR has not reviewed, checked, or processed this material. For additional information about the study, please contact the investigator(s) directly. If you have questions about the accessibility of materials distributed by ICPSR or require further assistance, please visit ICPSR's Accessibility Center.